Hence, Archil Marshania notes that the study does not enable making any conclusion about the links between being infected with coronavirus and blood types. Doctor Marshania claims that anyone can be infected and there are a lot of questions towards the study, for example: why has the study been taken seriously especially as it had not gone through critical analysis? If people with blood type A are more vulnerable, were other risk factors faced by these people taken into consideration, did they suffer from chronic diseases? Had it been a mere coincidence? Although 2,000 people had been examined, is it enough for making a conclusion, when over 180,000 people have already been infected? The study does not explain the phenomenon about what molecular influence blood type and virus may theoretically have to trigger this outcome and so on.
![rh a negative blood type conspiracy rh a negative blood type conspiracy](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Bh4jKXsquWA/maxresdefault.jpg)
Therefore, Rh factor cannot be determined by blood type.Īrchil Marshania also notes that the study itself, which allegedly finds that people with blood type A are more at risk than people with blood type 0, cannot prove that people with blood type A are more vulnerable to coronavirus.
![rh a negative blood type conspiracy rh a negative blood type conspiracy](https://journals.asm.org/cms/10.1128/CMR.00109-14/asset/46524597-240f-421e-8f23-b1f572a09e3c/assets/graphic/zcm0031525160007.jpeg)
So, one and the same blood type may be Rh positive and Rh negative. Being Rh positive means that you have proteins on red blood cells and if not, a person is Rh negative. Rhesus factor refers to protein on the surface of red blood cells. There are four main blood types and each of them is either Rh positive (Rh+) or Rh negative (Rh-). The Myth Detector reached out to doctor Archil Marshania for comment.Īrchil Marshania clarifies that blood type and Rh factor are not the same. Their articles focus not on blood type A as mentioned in the primary source, but on Rh positive factor. In particular, on March 17, news agencies metronome.ge, newposts.ge, gadacema.ge, alia.ge and cyc.ge spread the information with different interpretations. Some media outlets are writing not about blood type, but about the influence of COVID-19 on Rh positive and Rh negative, though the primary source says nothing about it. Part of Georgian media outlets covered the study as a new discovery of Chinese researchers another part spread the information with different interpretations, providing incorrect coverage of the study. How Georgian media outlets covered the information They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as confirmed information. Preprints are preliminary reports of work that have not been peer-reviewed.
RH A NEGATIVE BLOOD TYPE CONSPIRACY ARCHIVE
According to the information posted on MedRxiv, it is a free online archive and distribution server for complete but unpublished manuscripts (preprints) in the medical, clinical and related health sciences. Noteworthy that Stephen Chen refers to MedRxiv, the preprint server for health sciences, as its source. Of 206 patients who had died from Covid-19 in Wuhan, 85 had type A blood, which was 63 per cent more than the 52 with type O. Medical researchers in China took blood group patterns of more than 2,000 patients infected with the virus in Wuhan and Shenzhen and compared them to local healthy populations.
![rh a negative blood type conspiracy rh a negative blood type conspiracy](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ab/90/ec/ab90ec5c6107c1920cfd4261b72f54c6.png)
![rh a negative blood type conspiracy rh a negative blood type conspiracy](https://assets.cureus.com/uploads/figure/file/329063/lightbox_d5689220af9911ecbb2ce198de7f24ed-article_river_d586a000adad11ecb39e13afe2edfe3c-fig-2.png)
Stephen Chen, senior reporter for South China Morning Post, writes in the article that Chinese researchers conducted a preliminary study to find correlations between blood type and the likelihood of being hospitalized with COVID-19. The information about the study conducted by Chinese researchers was published on South China Morning Post on March 17, at 5pm, with a headline: “People with blood type A may be more vulnerable to coronavirus, China study finds.” Is it confirmed that a certain blood type is more vulnerable to coronavirus? Hence, it is not proved yet that people with blood type A are more vulnerable to coronavirus. As far the study is concerned, it was published on free medical platform it is hypothetical and has yet to be assessed by other experts. The media reports contain inaccuracies, because the primary source has mainly focused on blood type rather than Rh factor. Despite different interpretations, the news portals covered the study as confirmed information. Some media outlets claim that according to the study, Rh positive people are more at risk, saying nothing about blood type A patients. According to the media reports, scientists in China took blood group patterns of more than 2,000 patients infected with the virus in Wuhan and Shenzhen and found that blood type A patients are more vulnerable to coronavirus than those with other blood types. On March 17, several media outlets ( metronome.ge, newposts.ge, gadacema.ge, alia.ge and cyc.ge) spread information about the study conducted by Chinese researchers related to coronavirus and blood types.